نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد مشاوره خانواده دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

2 عضو هیات علمی گروه مشاوره دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر پیش‌بینی رضایت زناشویی براساس عوامل فرایندی و محتوایی خانواده در معلمان ابتدایی شهر کرج بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری کلیه معلمان متأهل مقطع ابتدایی شهر کرج در سال تحصیلی 94ـ1393 بودند که 358 نفر به‌صورت نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای تصادفی براساس جدول مورگان به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از مقیاس‌های سازگاری زناشویی (اسپنیر، 1976)، فرایند خانواده (سامانی، 1387) و محتوای خانواده (سامانی، 1387) استفاده شد. داده‌ها از طریق ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون گام‌به‌گام تحلیل شدند. نتایج رگرسیون گام‌ به ‌گام نشان داد که مؤلفه‌های تصمیم‌گیری و حل‌ مسأله، مهارت‌های ارتباطی، انسجام خانواده و مهارت‌های مقابله به استثنای باورهای مذهبی، توان پیش‌بینی رضایت زناشویی را دارند (001/0>P). همچنین، نشان داده شد که مؤلفه‌های محتوایی خانواده شامل محل زندگی و تسهیلات آموزشی، منابع مالی، زمان با هم بودن، شغل و تحصیلات، سلامت جسمی و روانی و وجهه یا موقعیت اجتماعی به غیر از محل زندگی و تسهیلات آموزشی، توان پیش‌بینی رضایت زناشویی را دارند (001/0>P).

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prediction of Marital Satisfaction Based on Factors of Family Process and Content among Primary School Teachers in the City of karaj

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hadi salimi 1
  • Farshad mohsen zade 2
  • ali mohammad nazari 2

چکیده [English]

The purpose of the present research was to predict marital satisfaction based on factors of family process and content among elementary school teachers in Karaj city. Research method was descriptive and correlation. The statistical population were all the married elementary schools teachers in Karaj city in the academic year of 2014-2015. 358 people were selected as the sample through random cluster sampling based on the Morgan table. To collect the, data Marital Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976), Family Process Scale (Samani, 2007/ 1387s.c.) and Family Content Scale (Samani, 2007/1387s.c.) were used. The data were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression. The results of stepwise regression showed that, components of family process including decision making and problem solving, communication skills, family solidarity and coping skills, except religious beliefs. can predict marital satisfaction. (P < 0.001). Also, it was shown that family content components including financial sources, time for being together, occupation and education, physical and mental health and social prestige, except living location and educational facilities, can predict marital satisfaction (P < 0.001).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • marital satisfaction
  • family process
  • family content

Badyal, P. (1992). The relationship between five demographic variable and marital satisfaction of men and women in dual-earner marriages. Unpublished master thesis, British Columbia University. Bradbury, T.N. Fincham, E.D. &amp; Beach, S.R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4): 64-98. Charnia, M.R., &amp; Ickes, W. (2007). Predicating marital satisfaction: Social absorption and individuation versus attachment anxiety avoidance. Personal Relationship, 14, 187-208. Cheng, C.C. (2010). A study of inter-cultural marital conflict and satisfaction in Taiwan. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34 (4), 354-362. Ellis, A. (1989). Rational-emotive. Couples therapy. New York: Pergamum press. Harper, J. M., Schaalje, B. G., &amp; Sandberg, J. G. (2000). Daily hassles, intimacy, and marital quality in later life marriages. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28, 1-18. Huber, C.H., Navarro, R.L., Womble, M.W., and Mumme, F.I. (2010), family Resilience and midlife marital satisfaction. The family journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 33: 347-456 1-1. Kamarzarrin, H., Naseri, E., Sobhani Khaledian, M., Shoshtari, M., &amp; Hasanvand, B. (2013). Investigating the relationship between family content and process model and depression, anxiety and stress among undergraduate students. World of Sciences Journal, (1), 131-142. Khaledian, M., Maleki, H., Khodaei, S., Talebian, S., &amp; Asadi, M. (2013). Investigating the Relationship between Family Content and Process Model with Emotional Intelligence, Life Expectancy and Depression, Anxiety and Stress among Undergraduate Students. Journal of Social Science Research, 1(7), 180-187. Latifses, V., Estroff, D., Field, T., Bush, J. (2005). Fathers massaging and relaxing their pregnant wives lowered anxiety and facilitate marital adjustment. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 9: 277–282 Michel, A (1991). Mutual respect and marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32(1), 41-50. Morrison, D.R. (2000). Communication skill and marital satisfaction. Journal of marriage and the family, 23(3), 25-37. Neff, L.A., &amp; Karney, B.R. (2004). How does context affect intimate relationships? Linking external stress and cognitive processes within marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 134-148. Olson, D.H. (2000), Circumflex Model of Marital and Family Systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22:144-167. Patrick, S., Sells, J.N., Giordano, F.G., &amp; Tollerud, T.R. (2007). Intimacy, differentiation, and personality variables as predicators of marital satisfaction. The family journal: counseling and therapy for couples and families, 4(15), 359-367. Randall, A.K., &amp; Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationship and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105-115. Samani, S. (2008). Validity and reliability of the family process and content scales. Paper presented in the XXIX international Congress of Psychology, Berlin, Germany, July 20-25. Samani, S., &amp; Sadeghzadeh, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of the self-report family content scale. Psychological Reports, 106, 539-547. Samani, S. (2011). Family process and content model: A contextual model for family studies. Procedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2285-2292. Sinha, P. &amp; Mukerjee, N. (1991). Marital adjustment and space orientation. Journal of social psychology, 130, 633-639. Sayaers, S.L., Kohn, C.S., &amp; Fresco, D.M. (2001). Marital conflict and depression in the context of marital discord. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25(6), 713-732. Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28. Story, L.B., &amp; Bradbury, T.N. (2004). Understanding marriage and stress: Essential questions and challenges. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1139-1162. Troxel, W.M. (2006). Marital quality, communal strength, and physical health. Doctoral dissertation, university of Pittsburg, 16-25. Winch, R. (1974). Selected studies in marriage and the family. New York: Rinehart and Winston, Inc.