نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه روان‌شناسی، واحد سنندج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، سنندج، ایران.

3 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی، تهران جنوب، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

10.30486/jsrp.2019.549201.

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش پیش‌بینی رفتار جامعه‌پسند بر اساس اعتماد اجتماعی و دیدگاه‌گیری اجتماعی بود.جامعة آماری پژوهش شامل معلمان تمامی مقاطع شاغل در مدارس شهر سنندج در سال 1396 بود که تعداد 425 نفر (230 زن و 195 مرد) شرکت‌کننده، به‌عنوان نمونه پژوهش به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای، پرسشنامه‌های شخصیت جامعه‌پسند (پنر، 2002)، اعتماد اجتماعی (صفاری‌نیا و شریف، 1389) و دیدگاه‌گیری اجتماعی (محققی و همکاران، 1395) را تکمیل کردند. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که سه مؤلفه از متغیر دیدگاه‌گیری اجتماعی شامل ادراک دیدگاه دیگران، خود را جای دیگری گذاشتن و احترام به تفاوت‌ها و دو مؤلفه از متغیر اعتماد اجتماعی شامل تمایلات همکاری‌جویانه و صداقت می‌توانند به‌طور معنی‌داری شخصیت جامعه‌پسند را پیش‌بینی کنند (P≤0/05) و 17 درصد واریانس را تبیین نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Prediction of Pro-social Behavior Using the Social Trust and Social Perspective Taking

نویسندگان [English]

  • sattar saidi 1
  • hamzeh ahmadian 2
  • majid saffarinia 3

1 PhD Student, Department of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.

3 Professor, Department of Psychology, Tehran South, Payam Noor university, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research was to anticipate pro-social behavior using social trust and social perspective taking. The statistical population of the study included teachers of all educational levels of Sanandaj city in 2017. in this study 425(230 women and 195 men) techers participated. They were selected based on categorical random sampling method. The participants completed the Pro-social Behavior (penner, 2002), Social Trust (saffarinia and sharif, 2009) and Social Perspective Taking (mohaghegi and et al, 2016) questionnaires. The results of regression analysis showed that three components of social perspective taking variable including perception of the views of others, putting self in the place of others and respect for differences, and two components of social trust variable including cooperative tendencies and honesty can be significantly predict pro-social personality (P≤0/05) and explain 17% of variance.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Pro-social Behavior
  • Social trust
  • social perspective taking

افقری، فاطمه؛ و قاسمی، سیمین. (1394). رابطه بین اعتماد اجتماعی و رفتارهای مطلوب اجتماعی. روان پرستاری، (2)3، 71-62.

صفاری‌نیا، مجید. (1391). آزمون‌هایروان‌شناسیاجتماعیوشخصیت. تهران: ارجمند.

صیدی، ستار؛ صفاری نیا، مجید. (1394). حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده از خانواده، دوستان و معلمان و ابعاد مختلف شخصیت جامعه‌پسند. پژوهش‌های روان‌شناسی اجتماعی. (17)5، 15-1.

صیدی، ستار. (اردیبهشت ماه 1395). اعتماد اجتماعی و رفتارهای جامعه‌پسند. تهران: مجموعه مقالات سومین کنکرة ملی روان‌شناسی اجتماعی ایران. 208-204.

محققی، حسین؛ ذوقی پایدار، محمدرضا؛ یعقوبی، ابوالقاسم؛ یارمحمدی واصل، مسیب؛ محمدزاده، سروه. (1395). تدوین و اعتباریابی مقیاس دیدگاه‌گیری اجتماعی در دانشجویان. شناخت اجتماعی. 5، (9)1. 32-18.

Bakker, L., Dekker, K., (2012). Social trust in urban neighbourhoods: the effect of relative ethnic group position. Urban Studies. 49, 20131–22047.

Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, punishment, and cooperation across 18 so-cieties: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 363–379.

Barr, J. J., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2007). Adolescent empathy and pro-social behavior in the multidimensional context of school culture. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(3), 231–250.

 

 

Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656-1666.

Battistich,V., Solomon, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1997). Caring school communities, Educational Psychology, 32, 137-151.

Baumert, A., Halmburger, A., Rothmund, T., Schemer, C. (2017). Everyday dynamics in generalized social and political trust. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 44–54.

Branscombe, N. R.,& Baron, R. A. (2017). Social Psychology. Global Edition-Pearson Education Limited.

Brownell, C. A., Ramani, G. B., & Zrewas, S. (2006). Becoming a social partner with peers: Cooperation and social understanding in one-and two-year-olds. Child Development, 77, 803- 821.

Brownell, C., Svetlova, M., & Nichols, S. (2009). To share or not to share: When do toddlers respond to another’s needs?, Infancy, 14, 117–130.

Buss, D. (2003). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Allyn Bacon.

Cadenhead, A. C., & Richman, C. L. (1996).The effects of interpersonal trust and group status on prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Social behavior and Personality. 24(2).169-184.

Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., Randall, B.A. (2003) Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 107–134.

Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., McGinley, M. M., Samper, P., Tur, A.,& Sandman, D. (2012). The interplay of emotional instability, empathy, and coping on prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 675-680.

Christ, C. C., Carlo, G., Stoltenberg, S. F. (2016). Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Indirectly Predict Prosocial Behavior through Perspective Taking and Empathic Concern. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12152.

Contardi, A., Imperatori, C., Penzo, I., Gatto, C. D., & Farina, B. (2016). The Association among Difficulties in Emotion Regulation, Hostility, and Empathy in a Sample of Young Italian Adults. Frontiers in Psychology. 7:1068.

Crain. W,. (2014). theories of development: concepts and applications. Sixth Edition. Pearson Education.

De Dreu, C. K. W., Giebels, E., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Social motives and trust in integrative negotiation: The disruptive effects of punitive capability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83,408-422.

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotional, and personality development (6thed., Vol. 3, pp. 646-718). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. I. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (series Eds.) & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6 th ed., pp. 646-718). New York: John Wiley.

Epley, N., & Waytz, A. (2010). Mind perception. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 498−541)., 5th Edn. Hoboken,NJ: Wiley.

Epley, N., Caruso, E., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 872– 889.

Erden, A. and H. Erden (2009). "Predicting organizational trust level of school managers and teachers at elementary schools", Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1.

Evans, A. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2009). The psychology (and economics) of trust. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 1003−1017.

Evans, A. M., Krueger, J. I. (2011). Elements of trust: Risk and perspective-taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 171-177.

Ferrin, D.L., Bligh, M.C., & Kohles, J.C. (2007). Can I trust you to trust me? A theory of trust, monitoring, and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Group & Organization Management, 32, 465- 499.

Fett, A-K. J., Shergill, S. S., Gromann, P. M., Dumontheil, I., Blakemore, S-J., Yakub, F., & Krabbendam, L. (2014). Trust and social reciprocity in adolescence– A matter of perspective-taking. Journal of Adolescence, 37, 175-184.

Gehlbach, H., Brinkworth, M. E., & Wang, M.-T. (2012). The social perspective taking process: What motivates individuals to take another’s perspective? Teachers College Record, 114(1). 197-225.

Gehlbach, H., Marietta, G.,King, A. M., Karutz, C., Bailenson, J. N., Dede, C. (2015). Many ways to walk a mile in another’s moccasins: Type of social perspective taking and its effect on negotiation outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 523-532.

Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., and Altoe, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence. 31, 93–105.

Greener, S. H. (2000). Peer assessment of children’s prosocial behaviour. Journal of Moral Education, 29, 47-60.

Habibov, N. Cheung, A. Auchynnikava, A. (2017). Does social trust increase willingness to pay taxes to improve public healthcare? Cross-sectional cross-country instrumental variable analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 189, 25-34.

Hastings, P. D., McShane, K. E., Parker, R., & Ladha, F. (2007). Ready to make nice: Parental socialization of young sons' and daughters' prosocial behaviors with peers. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 177-200.

Hoffman, M. L. (2002). Empathy and moral development. Combridge UK university press.

Hoffman, M.L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Jackson, M., & Tisak, M. S. (2001). Is prosocial behaviour a good thing? Developmental changes in children's evaluations of helping, sharing, cooperating, and comforting. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 349-367.

Jasinski, M. P. (2011). Social Trust, Anarchy, and International Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Johnson, D. W. (1975). Cooperativeness and social perspective taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 241–244.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.

Karney, B.R. & Gauer, B. (2010). Cognitive Complexity and Marital Interaction in Newlyweds. Personal Relationships, 17, 181- 200.

Kerr, M., Beck, K., Shattuck, T., Kattar, C., & Uriburu, D. (2003). Family involvement, problem and prosocial behaviour outcomes of Latino youth. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27, 55-65.

Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H., & Engbersen, G. (2007). Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 44(5), 1069–1091.

Li, X., Bian, C., Chen, Y., Huang, J., Ma, Y., Tang, L., Yan, Q., Ye, X., Tang, J., Yu, Y. (2015). Indirect aggression and parental attachment in early adolescence: Examining the role of perspective taking and empathetic concern. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 499-503.

Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2011). Teacher-student interactions in fifth grade classrooms: Relations with children’s peer behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 257–266.

Marton, I., Wiener, J., Rogers, M., Moore, C., & Tannock, R. (2009). Empathy and social perspective taking in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 107–118.

Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. A., and Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). An fMRI investigation of empathy for ’social pain’ and subsequent prosocial behavior. Neuroimage 55, 381–388.

McMahon, S. D., Wernsman, J., and Parnes, A. L. (2006). Understanding prosocial behavior: the impact of empathy and gender among African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. Health 39, 135–137.

Mohr, P., Howells, K., Gerace, A., Day, A., & Wharton, M. (2007). The role of perspective taking in anger arousal. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 507–517.

Nordgren, L. F., Banas, K., & MacDonald, G. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: Why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 120–128.

Palermo, F., Hanish, L. D., Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., & Reiser, M. (2007). Preschoolers’ academic readiness: What role does the teacher-child relationship play? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(4), 407–422.

Paluck, E. L. (2010). Is it better not to talk? Group polarization, extended contact,and perspective taking in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(9), 1170–1185.

Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology,56, 365-392.

Righetti, F. and Finkenauer, C. (2011). If You Are Able to Control Yourself, I Will Trust You: The Role of Perceived Self-Control in Interpersonal Trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5),874-886.

Scourfield, J., Bethan, J., Neilson, M., & McGuffin, P. (2004). The development of prosocial behaviour in children and adolescents: A twin study. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 45, 927-935.

Selman, R. (1971). Taking another’s perspective: Role-taking devel-opment in early childhood. Child Development, 42, 1721–1734.

Selman, R. L. (2003). Social awareness: The growth of interpersonal understanding. In R. L. Selman (Ed.), The promotion of social awareness: Powerful lessons from the partnership of develop-mental theory and classroom practice. NY: Sage.

Singh, U., & Srivastava, K. B. L. (2009). Interpersonal trust and organizational citizenship behavior. Psychological Studies, 54(1), 65–76.

Stanger, N., Kavussanu, M., and Ring, C. (2012). Put Yourself in Their Boots: Effects of Empathy on Emotion and Aggression. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 34, 208-222.

Stolle, D., Soroka, S., Johnston, R. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Neigh-borhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions. Political Studies. 56, 57-75.

Taylor, M. (1988). Conceptual perspective taking: Children’s ability to distinguish what the know from what they see. Child Development, 68, 436- 455.

Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Trommsdorff, G., Friedlmeier, W., & Mayer, B. (2007). Sympathy, distress, and prosocial behavior of preschool children in four cultures. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 284-293.

van Ingen, E., & Bekkers, R. (2015). Generalized trust through civic engagement? Evidence from five national panel studies. Political Psychology, 36(3), 277–294.

Van Lange, P. A. M. (2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 71–76.

Welch, M.R., Rivera, R., Conway, B.P., Yonkoski, J., Lupton, P.M., Giancola, R. (2005). Determinants and consequences of social trust. Sociol. Inq, 75, 453-473.